A Berlin-based political analyst with a decade of experience covering European affairs and a passion for investigative journalism.
Aziz Ansari's directorial debut, this fantasy comedy by comedian Aziz Ansari, is facing challenges in theaters. Several reasons may explain its reception: The uninspired name fails to express its movie's distinctive charm. The script is often moralizing and obvious with the messages. Its performances are flat and presentational, like the actors are reciting lines straight from the page. Moreover, the film comes during an era marked by economic uncertainty and disparity, which may render viewers less receptive to a story which implies wealthy individuals have all the advantages while those in need have heart.
However, this is where the movie stands out: The film is original, bold, imaginative, often humorous, and certainly timely. Plus, it offers an unexpectedly great the actor character-driven experience.
Personally, I've not regarded Reeves to be a good actor. His flat speaking style and consistent expression of slight perturbation has always felt limited, regardless of his wide variety of characters he has taken on over the past 40 of his career. Astute directors have cast him in roles where his stoic nature fits ideally, including My Own Private Idaho to the sci-fi classic to the action series. But almost every one of these characters called for Reeves to seem hardened, distant, and detached.
In Good Fortune, Reeves plays an angel, a minor guardian angel tasked with looking after people who text while behind the wheel. His entire job involves remaining in their vehicles and lightly touching the drivers' shoulders as they are about to crash, alerting the person so they brake in time. However, while standing overlooking the city, looking down on humanity similar to an alternative version of the angel in Wim Wenders' renowned film the angel story, the character gets aspirational. He desires to become an exceptional guardian and a savior of wayward souls.
Therefore, he presents his presence to struggling handyman Arj (portrayed by the director), who is residing in a vehicle and cursing his situation. Gabriel then swaps the man with the existence of extremely wealthy businessman a character (played by Seth Rogen). This point behind the exercise was that Arj to understand the wealthy man's existence comes with significant downsides, and thankfully go back to his original circumstances, similar to a character in It's a Wonderful Life.
Problem was, Arj immediately discovers how Jeff's problems (tedious meetings, expensive pool-heater bill) prove negligible and readily solved with money. He further realizes how being rich provides limitless chances for self-indulgent enjoyment. He shows no interest in going back to his previous life, and the angel is unable to force him to go back. Subsequently, additional bad news comes: Because of exceeding his duties and messing with the balance of the world, the character loses his position as an celestial role, and turned into a human being.
Personally, I remained never convinced by Reeves as an celestial being with grand aspirations and a burning desire to make a difference. Reeves turns in a familiar vaguely constipated performance he has been offering for no less than the past three ten-year periods. Viewing him as an celestial being that has just become mortal initially, however, was highly entertaining, due to something which really astonished me initially: This is something new for Reeves. Or to be precise, an aspect old.
Soon into the character's baffling career being a human, staying with the wealthy character (who the angel had swapped with the handyman's hand-to-mouth life and jobless situation), Gabriel begins hesitantly experimenting with human experiences such as chewing and swallowing food. And the actor grins. Genuinely, cautiously, happily smiles. (It's a lot much believable than the grin on the promotional image, which appears digitally altered.)
The moment truly surprised me to realize how surprising and refreshing that smile was. At what point was the last time audiences saw the actor grin in a movie where he wasn't showing ill will, sarcasm, or resentment? He probably tries it at some point in the recent ill-conceived Bill & Ted Face the Music, but I am not going to returning to the mess to confirm. The actor has been stuck with serious, violent, introspective, or simply solemn roles for so long that merely watching him grin seemed like observing a completely new actor.
As the story progresses, Gabriel finds himself needing to take a kitchen position, a role that fails to provide enough to live on, and he begins chain-smoking due to frustration. Simply the sight of Reeves in a cheap paper food-service hat, with his recent signature locks tied in a plain ponytail, leaning on a building and puffing on a cigarette, proves worthy of the price of admission. His dishwasher attire completely alters his face and body: Unexpectedly, the slim, suited action star of his famous movies becomes awkward, ordinary, and a lot more relatable.
Good Fortune is not always fun to watch, especially when the director (who also authored the script) must find believable explanations for {Ar
A Berlin-based political analyst with a decade of experience covering European affairs and a passion for investigative journalism.