A Berlin-based political analyst with a decade of experience covering European affairs and a passion for investigative journalism.
The saga started with a isolated photograph, perhaps the most significant ever captured of a member of the monarchy.
There stood the Duke of York, standing closely beside a young woman, while an associate grinned suggestively in the backdrop.
Lacking that snapshot, shot at a gathering in 2001, it would have been difficult to accept the assertions of a young woman who said she was transported across the Atlantic and forced to have brief sexual encounters with a member of the royal family?
A strange, indicative action by someone who had publicly stated to have no known about her, said he could never have had relations with her, and yet paid a large amount of his mother's money to settle a protracted legal case.
Considering this, conversations of the royals acting firmly to distance themselves from Andrew are wide of the mark. This controversy has persisted for the better part of 15 years since that photograph, and another image of Andrew ambling pleasantly with a disgraced financier came to light.
Trips were documented in royal annual reports: chopper travel from the estate to a golf course and back again in time for dining, exclusive air travel instead of regular transport, all for the benefit of "the frequent flyer".
Additionally the presumption which expected respect when he walked into a space or the extreme awareness about his designations used on his correspondence in letters to his personal acquaintances.
He avoided accountability while his matriarch, who strangely spoiled him, was still living. The Queen did at least remove him of official roles and ceremonial ranks in the aftermath of his catastrophic and, we now know, mendacious television interview six years ago.
Merely in the last two weeks that events accelerated, following the release of books giving more grim details of his conduct and that of his associates.
Additional revelations have again highlighted Andrew's belief that he could avoid lying about his interaction with a convicted criminal.
Society (and the journalists) were far ahead of the royals. There was nobody of any importance to speak up for him, a consequence of all those years of presumption.
The more astute monarchical figures realized that. The primary concern is to transfer the monarchy, if not as before at least complete and untarnished.
For generations the last 190 years trying to reverse the reputation of earlier rulers, proving they are useful, responsible and reactive to their people.
He was placing all that in danger in an age when submission and discretion is no longer adequate.
Eventually, the notoriously uncertain sovereign was pushed additional. There was little choice. The palace had surrendered command of the narrative.
Now it is the removal of designations and the persistent and life-long public humiliation that will hurt Andrew most deeply.
He continues to be a counsellor of state, on paper able to substitute for the sovereign, and he is still in the lineage to the throne, but none of these will truly occur.
Will people he comes across still acknowledge him? Will they still forget themselves and call him Prince? Would they say Mr,
Certainly, he is not retiring to a common area, but to the royal family's extensive grounds at Sandringham.
There, he will be furnished by the king with one of the royal residences and given some form of financial support.
This differs from his former home, where he paid a token payment for more than 20 years, and the area is a bit far, but even so it may not be far enough.
Matters remain unresolved. There are still records in the hands of overseas authorities to be disclosed.
Perhaps for the moment the institutional damage to the institution is restricted. The narrative from the palace was clearly that the stripping of designations was what the sovereign, and notably other senior monarchical figures, wanted.
An end to pretence that Andrew was making the choice himself. And, notably, the concise statement showed evidently that the institution were supporting the victim's narrative of events.
Additionally, for the first time they ultimately showed regard for the survivors: "The measures are deemed necessary, despite the truth that he continues to deny the accusations against him."
Finally it is entitlement, selfishness and indolence that will destroy the monarchy. In his foolishness, self-indulgence and greed, Andrew seems never to have learned that truth.
A Berlin-based political analyst with a decade of experience covering European affairs and a passion for investigative journalism.